Summative evaluation - Revision history

Zeno Gantner: * Wikipedia: Summative assessment

2011-09-26T09:03:51Z

* Wikipedia: Summative assessment

Usabart at 02:50, 1 March 2011

2011-03-01T02:50:18Z

Alan at 21:14, 21 February 2011

2011-02-21T21:14:54Z

Usabart at 19:11, 21 February 2011

2011-02-21T19:11:20Z

Usabart: Created page with "The goal of summative evaluation is to find out whether feature P causes quality X (regardless of the system that uses feature P). The usual summative approach is to test system ..."

2011-02-21T19:10:42Z

Created page with "The goal of summative evaluation is to find out whether feature P causes quality X (regardless of the system that uses feature P). The usual summative approach is to test system ..."

New page

The goal of summative evaluation is to find out whether feature P causes quality X (regardless of the system that uses feature P). The usual summative approach is to test system A versus system B, where these systems only differ on feature P, and then measuring quality X to see if it differs between the two systems. Summative methods include A/B tests (field trials) and controlled experiments.

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 Researchers planning to do a [[user-centric recommender system evaluation]] need to be aware of the [[trade-offs between formative and summative evaluation]].
 [[Category:Evaluation]]
-[[Category:User-centric evaluation]]
+== External links ==

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:50, 1 March 2011
Line 3:		Line 3:
	Researchers planning to do a [[user-centric recommender system evaluation]] need to be aware of the [[trade-offs between formative and summative evaluation]].		Researchers planning to do a [[user-centric recommender system evaluation]] need to be aware of the [[trade-offs between formative and summative evaluation]].
	[[Category:Evaluation]]		[[Category:Evaluation]]
		+	[[Category:User-centric evaluation]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:14, 21 February 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	The goal of summative evaluation is to find out whether feature P causes quality X (regardless of the system that uses feature P). The usual summative approach is to test system A versus system B, where these systems only differ on feature P, and then measuring quality X to see if it differs between the two systems. Summative methods include A/B tests (field trials) and controlled experiments.	+	The goal of '''summative evaluation''' is to find out whether feature P causes quality X (regardless of the system that uses feature P). The usual summative approach is to test system A versus system B, where these systems only differ on feature P, and then measuring quality X to see if it differs between the two systems. Summative methods include A/B tests (field trials) and controlled experiments.

	Researchers planning to do a [[user-centric recommender system evaluation]] need to be aware of the [[trade-offs between formative and summative evaluation]].		Researchers planning to do a [[user-centric recommender system evaluation]] need to be aware of the [[trade-offs between formative and summative evaluation]].
		+	[[Category:Evaluation]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:11, 21 February 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
	The goal of summative evaluation is to find out whether feature P causes quality X (regardless of the system that uses feature P). The usual summative approach is to test system A versus system B, where these systems only differ on feature P, and then measuring quality X to see if it differs between the two systems. Summative methods include A/B tests (field trials) and controlled experiments.		The goal of summative evaluation is to find out whether feature P causes quality X (regardless of the system that uses feature P). The usual summative approach is to test system A versus system B, where these systems only differ on feature P, and then measuring quality X to see if it differs between the two systems. Summative methods include A/B tests (field trials) and controlled experiments.
		+
		+	Researchers planning to do a [[user-centric recommender system evaluation]] need to be aware of the [[trade-offs between formative and summative evaluation]].