Difference between revisions of "Formative evaluation"

From RecSysWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
In formative research, the goal is to improve a certain system A in terms of a certain quality X. The usual formative approach is to test system A qualitatively, focusing on quality X, looking for improvements on certain features P, Q and R that will increase quality X.
 
In formative research, the goal is to improve a certain system A in terms of a certain quality X. The usual formative approach is to test system A qualitatively, focusing on quality X, looking for improvements on certain features P, Q and R that will increase quality X.
  
[[Trade-offs]] exist between formative and [[summative evaluation]].
+
Researchers planning to do a [[user-centric recommender system evaluation]] need to be aware of the [[trade-offs between formative and summative evaluation]].
 +
[[Category:Evaluation]]
 +
[[Category:User-centric evaluation]]

Latest revision as of 22:49, 28 February 2011

In formative research, the goal is to improve a certain system A in terms of a certain quality X. The usual formative approach is to test system A qualitatively, focusing on quality X, looking for improvements on certain features P, Q and R that will increase quality X.

Researchers planning to do a user-centric recommender system evaluation need to be aware of the trade-offs between formative and summative evaluation.